[x]
[x]
—
Google is shutting down Google Reader, because they are stupid. (via shortformblog)
Noooooooo!
(via popculturebrain)
Wait, first Tweetdeck is being taken away, and now this?
Actually, I have no rage against this as I’ve never used RSS feeds for anything in my life. However, my friend swears by NewsBlur.
(via christopherhuff)
I HATE this.
(via mchughla)Dammit Google.
(via mchughla)
Google shows off the many features of its augmented reality project Google Glass.
ReadWrite’s Dan Lyons points to a disturbing trend in tech journalism as he tries to unwrap why iPhones have such significant US marketshare while the rest of the world runs 75% Android.
Android, goes a coverage tick, is for poor people:
But Apple and its cheerleaders in the States don’t just criticize Android phones; they also criticize Android users, depicting them as low-class people who are uneducated, poor, cheap and too lacking in “taste” (a favorite Apple fanboy word) to pay for an Apple product and instead willing to settle for a low-price knockoff.
See, for example, a recent story by Sam Biddle on Gizmodo called “Android Is Popular Because It’s Cheap, Not Because It’s Good,” illustrated with a photo of a homeless man sleeping next to a shopping cart and bags full of collected cans. Nice touch!… Apparently inspired by this article, John Biggs of TechCrunch picked up the “Android is cheap” meme and ran with it too…
…[I]n America, a noisy chorus of pro-Apple bloggers keeps repeating the mantra about Android being cheap and crappy and second-rate, and people keep believing it and insisting that they must have an iPhone. American consumers have been told that those Android smartphones are hard to use, or complicated, or geeky, or unreliable, and, worst of all, on top of all that, they’re made for poor people.
And that’s where the rhetoric starts to border on something ugly. Look at what Apple fans were saying in April 2012 when Instagram became available on Android. Cult of Mac had a nice roundup which included sneering tweets about Walmart and “poor peasants” and “riff raff” and “poor people,” but also included these:
- “It’s like when all the ghetto people started coming to the nice suburbs. Instagram was our nice lil suburb.”
- “Instagram just got a whole lotta ghetto.”
The italics are mine, and I’ve added them for a reason. Yes, it’s the dreaded G word, and it comes up again in a Dec. 13, 2011 article by Glenn Derene, who wrote that “Android’s Cheap, Low Quality Apps Make It Feel Like A Technological Ghetto.”
Related: Henry Blodget, founder of Business Insider, writes about the horrors of flying economy. Evidently, he couldn’t charge his laptop, there was no wifi and the food was bad.
Boston, MA, is closer Uiramutã, Brazil, (2696.649 miles) than it is to Santa Cruz, CA (2698.642 miles).
Calculations, and image, via Google Maps Distance Calculator.
Coworker: This should fill up my last couple of minutes.
Me: oracleofbacon.org is better
Coworker: Wow. I didnt know you could be elitist about this.
Me: It is. With Oracle of Bacon you can find out how far everyone is from Kevin Bacon and you can also find out how far someone is from someone else who isn’t Kevin Bacon.
If you wanted to know the Bacon Number between Jamie Kennedy and Cary Grant, for example.
—
Sen. Charles Schumer • Arguing that Google and Apple’s separate, upcoming 3D aerial maps raise major privacy concerns. He even wrote an open letter to the companies on the matter, which features this all-caps scare message: “TECHNOLOGY STRONG ENOUGH TO SEE THROUGH WINDOWS AND EVEN CATCH SUN BATHERS IN BACK YARDS” Problem is, Schumer appears to be citing a Daily Mail report on the matter that suggested that “military grade” spy planes were used to get this data, despite the fact that appears to not be the case. Google, in fact, responded, suggesting Schumer misunderstood the technology. “We currently don’t blur aerial imagery because the resolution isn’t sharp enough for it to be a concern,” a spokesperson said in a statement. (via shortformblog)
This is what happens when we have people making laws about technologies they do not understand nor make an attempt to understand.
(via shortformblog)
Yesterday Google announced they had mapped out parts of the Amazon that you can now navigate on Google Street View.
Google, taking the mystery out of the world since 2000.
Cannot wait for Google to start mapping the canyons of Mars.
(via npr)
Redditor Ulto has a question:
Anyone else wish google would actually do what the picture shows to raise awareness tomorrow?
Friend: one time I looked at a place that would have been me renting a room from a house inhabited by an old lady and the kitchen ceiling was covered with tin foil and I was scared. Renting a room in a house, not from a house
Me: I thought the house might have been sentient. Then you destroyed that dream of mine. Thank you.
Friend: You know it would probably be easier if you could just rent a room from a robot house. Then if there are any problems it could fix itself internally, immediately.
Me: And be much more fun.
Friend: Of course, it would be impossible to get away with violating the lease.
Me: If the house was good and didn’t try to screw me over, then it’d be okay.
Friend: Yeah it would have to be like an Apple or Honda built robot I would trust that. Or Google.
Me: I would trust Google in partnership with Honda.
Friend: Definitely. Apple would make the living experience elegant and intuitive though.
Me: I’d still enjoy a Google/Honda house more.
Friend: I would trade living in reality for living in a suspended state and experiencing an Apple-designed reality.
Me: I would trade living in reality for living in a designed reality no matter what. This world sucks. I want a better user experience. PUT ME BACK IN THE MATRIX.
Google marks what would have been stop-motion clay animation pioneer Art Cloakey’s 90th birthday.
And it’s fully interactive, of course.
Somehow cooler than the Muppet one. Surprisingly.
(via shortformblog)